Print Subscribe to RSS
Loading...

Examples of CQA's in Action

CQL’s individual professional designation/certification, Certified Quality Analyst (CQA), develops expertise in creating information from the numerous data collection activities present in most organizations and systems. We focus on data interpretation and data presentation to meet multiple data requirements at local, regional, state and federal levels. CQAs also help build the internal capacity for data driven decision making and developing an Integrated Quality Management System.

An integral part of the certification is the completion of a Quality Management Project. The project can be on analysis and synthesis of existing organizational data or could be on a pilot of new data collection. Below are a few examples of the issues that candidates based their projects upon.

 

Issue: Human Rights

Project focused on a survey of the human rights knowledge base of the volunteers on HR committees and staff. Through the survey, they learned which areas of rights knowledge were best and least understood by committee members and by staff – and where additional training was needed.

Results: Recommendations resulting from the project included enhanced training in use of medications for behavior management and guardianship issues.

Future: Consideration for establishing an organizational rights officer was also identified as a result of this project.

 

Issue: Complaints

During a period of rapid growth, the organization saw rise in the number of complaints from both staff and people served regarding their satisfaction with the services provided. In keeping with the goal of being a “World Class” organization, the CQA candidate undertook a study of the types of complaints received and the way they were resolved – over a three month period, in four different program locations. A key question in the study was how well staff recognizes the importance and value of documenting and addressing complaints.

Results: CQA candidate determined that with increased staff training, reporting and timely response to complaints increased dramatically.

Future: Further study is planned to learn more about the impact of enhanced complaint data on the overall system of service delivery.

 

Issue: Employee Retention

In addition to its commitment to provide a person-centered approach to people with autism, the organization strives to be staff centered ensuring quality and satisfaction in work. The project addressed the questions of “what variables impact employee satisfaction and retention?” and “what can be done to improve overall satisfaction and retention?” CQA candidates used surveys and focus groups to collect data for current staff – gathering both quantitative and qualitative results.

Results: The findings led to a series of recommendations regarding supervision, training and compensation that were presented to the organization’s leadership, board and staff as a whole.

 

Issue: Exercising Rights

Two CQA candidates did an assessment of how staff was supporting people with intellectual disabilities in exercising their rights. They sampled staff in two locations where multiple services were provided. They were brought into focus groups and asked to complete a simple open-ended questionnaire regarding how they had supported people in exercising their rights. The rights were categorized and compared to 11 key rights in keeping with the organization’s mission, vision and values, and as established within the United Nation’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Half of the focus group members were invited to attend a new training regarding Human Rights, again based on the organization’s mission, vision and values and the Universal Declaration. This training included a timed test on Rights, a 15 slide PowerPoint presentation and a review of the timed test using a decision-making tree as a point of discussion. The third phase was inviting all participants back to take the original questionnaire.

Results: Staff were not aware of the Human Rights Committee, its role or how to access the committee. The training increased the evidence of staff advocating for individuals in regards to rights.

Future: Recommendations were made to establish an annual rights training rather than the existing orientation training plus incidental learning; to provide this training to people receiving services and families; to increase the capacity and accessibility of the existing Human Rights Committees; and to create the position of an ombudsman/human rights officer for the organization.



Back to Top